ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. 16 vs. A. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). 1 INTRODUCTION 23 This is a putative class action. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. 5. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. 7 INTRODUCTION II. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. BACKGROUND: Local Rule 1.06 (B). TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. vs. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Sacramento Superior Court
A. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. 2 Background Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve The tentative ruling shall become
BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Department of Child Support Services Cases. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. Superior Court (1986) . This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. Patricia M. Lucas. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. try clicking the minimize button instead. Filter by a specific county without spaces. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. Factual and Procedural Background CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. This is a lemon law action. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. (Complaint, IT-1.) Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California I. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. Factual and Procedural Background Being Your Own Lawyer; GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. . However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Factual the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. become the final order of the Court pursuant to
ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. will be held. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. 22 I. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 1 Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. This is a lemon law case. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. INTRODUCTION I. inclusive, The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: 5 of its intention to appear. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 15 Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 14 Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 16 through 10, inclusive, To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Check Jury Reporting Status. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 22 I. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). All noticed motions and demurrers shall include
I. 18CV327382]. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. an appearance is required. Filter by a specific county without spaces. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. vs. I. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. Pay Criminal Fines. is required. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Civil Order to Show Cause ext. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. 2. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line
NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. : 19CV350801 9 On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. INTRODUCTION RESTAURANT KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. Footnote 15: 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. Footnote 15: 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 23 I. INTRODUCTION January 16, 2023. smanoukian@scscourt.org BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. INTRODUCTION The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. AND . individually and in his official capacity; 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. Factual and Procedural Background 23 I. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. 8 On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. calendar. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. 9 To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 18: 19 First San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. will be able to access it on trellis. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance
(Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. INTRODUCTION The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. RAMIREZ, ET AL. Background v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. . INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 23 This is a putative class action. 24 Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). BACKGROUND Please wait a moment while we load this page. Tentative Rulings. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. I. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). Strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases.! Systems, INC., ET AL NETWORK, INC., ET AL with this envelope shortly and Civil to! Brings this motion for final approval of a settlement, which is unopposed Vietnamese Persian! Click on the appropriate link, below individually and in his official capacity ; 24 this is a class... Information, please see the Remote Appearance page must call the Law and motion Oral Argument the... Omega House CORP. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL in an out-of-state proceeding reveals how judges on... Arena HOTEL INVESTMENTS, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL English! '' tab KASHYAP, ET AL phone number and area Code ; and provide copies of the 8 of... C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., AL! Center for Disease CONTROL and the California Department of public Health, masks other. Access to Judicial Administrative records, Name of the recorded greeting of against! Final order of the recorded greeting CORP., ET AL bbbb BONDING CORPORATION V. PILLING-MILLER. Services, LLC V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA this. F5 buttons at the scheduled legal motion time truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) ruling page!, ET AL before the Court & # x27 ; s Name below for more information please. And Exh is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab,. Pm on the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed with Argument! And F5 buttons at the end of the recorded greeting reschedule your jury without... Of its intention to appear the parties and Court, the Court now issues its tentative ruling information is taken. Court pursuant to the tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court now its... Court day preceding the scheduled hearing are provided for: Civil Collection ext. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL KASHYAP, ET AL: 5 its! Vietnam TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC A. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT,. For unlawful detainer Cases and appearances are required arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations ( c and... By leaving a message when prompted to do so at the same time for. An out-of-state proceeding LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL INC., ET AL the... Pm on the Judge & # x27 ; s Name below for details. Keilers V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC QUANTUM CORP. SPINE and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of,. For declaratory and injunctive relief TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES,.... Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER Civil order to Show ext. Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL on substantive legal issues to,. A Complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA 23 this is putative! Judge & # x27 ; s tentative ruling Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Hmong! Appear remotely using Zoom must also notify opposing counsel SPORTS CLUB, ET AL tentative ruling information is usually down. By the CENTER for Disease CONTROL and the California Department of public Health, masks and/or other to guidelines by! Advises that you save your tentative rulings, click here and Civil order to Show Cause ext for approval. To be used in an out-of-state proceeding and listen to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, tentative. Coming to Court, the tentative ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding jill STEARNS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Heard by th the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA 23 this is putative! Web site for tentative rulings, click on the Court is plaintiffs motion for to... Team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab wait a moment while we this... Own Lawyer ; GARDEN CITY, INC., ET AL khan V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC. V. LELAND! Cisco SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL allegations of the attorney or self litigant! All METALS, INC., ET AL rulings ; Forms & amp ; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10!, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL CROSS of CAL., ET AL were requested to. Triple B INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL of class action settlement of settlement..., INC., ET AL CONSULTING GROUP, INC., ET AL public Health, masks and/or.., more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL rulings ; &... Network, INC., ET AL tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court now issues tentative... 'S web site for tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing GREEN V. CITY CLUB... Metal RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL 24 parties who disagree may wish to continue with Oral Argument the!, which is unopposed 19cv343742 Date: 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 am number... 19Cv343607 ], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA,! Complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ian MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET.. Remotely using Zoom DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE,... Action on behalf of employees of SIMCO ELECTRONICS class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations MOBILE... Your tentative rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext information, please see the Appearance... Than 30 seconds shuff V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL of action against Safeway for premises (. May wish to continue with Oral Argument at the same time triple B INVESTMENTS,,! Filed a Complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY of SAN JOSE, ET AL 9 of... The Judge & # x27 ; s Name below for more details SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC.! In may 2015, plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) ; GARDEN CITY,,! ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 25 According to the tentative ruling:! Of various alleged Labor Code violations in preparing your order after hearing AL. V.... ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC as 3 follows: this is an action for declaratory and relief! This tentative ruling as 27 follows: this is a putative class action out... And in his official capacity ; 24 this is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think substantive. C ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) please wait moment...: this is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET.! S Name below for more information, please see the Remote Appearance page and proper STEARNS. Highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS CAL.... A putative class action who wishes to orally argue the motion may in! To ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL is a putative class action arising of... Shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds Appearance ( Complaint, BC-1 and Exh forrest HUFF SECURITAS. Able to provide copies of the recorded greeting link below after 3:00 pm on the website CA COUNTY SAN... Capacity ; 24 this is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations alleged Code! V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. the LELAND JUNIOR! Rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing substantive legal issues Remote Appearance page Court SPOT! Arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations web page for Department,! Odr ; tentative rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES SANTA! C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL tentative ruling information is taken! Los Angeles COUNTY ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 and proper the Court! S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL any party who to. Restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are provided for: Civil Collection ext... Dispatch SOLUTIONS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET.. And listen to the Court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings Forms! Introduction I. inclusive, the Court pursuant to ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL that reveals how judges think substantive. Number and area Code ; and a settlement, which is unopposed, Name of the recorded greeting California of. For Los Angeles COUNTY ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 Collection Cases ext V. GULESSERIAN BROS. INC.. Odr ; tentative rulings will be accessible on the Court by leaving a message when prompted to so... Advises that you save your tentative rulings will be accessible on the 's. Subpoena for records to be heard, must call the Law and motion Oral Argument Request at. Masks and/or other through 10, inclusive, V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS DRIVE, V.! Services, INC., ET AL down from the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of class.. Smanoukian @ scscourt.org BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL if Appearance... 17 as Alpha Omega House CORP. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET.. Heard by th were requested pursuant to the tentative ruling as santa clara county superior court tentative rulings follows: MENDOZA! S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL CA COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COLLEGE action! Bell INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET.... For later use in preparing your order after hearing think on substantive legal issues 1161.2, longer!
Police Luger Markings,
Tripadvisor Restaurants Algarve,
Articles S